It is beginning to look like the so-called federal judge who ruled against President Donald Trump’s lawyer is so hopelessly compromised that he should never been allowed to hear the case in the first place.
For those of you unaware, Judge Kimba Wood denied a temporary restraining order to seal up the materials that the FBI took from the home and office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen. As Cohen pointed out, even the FBI said that it wasn’t going to use the materials any time soon, but the judge refused to accept the order, anyway.
Another of Trump’s lawyers, Joanna Hendon, wrote to the court saying, “Fairness and justice – as well as the appearance of fairness and justice – require that, before they are turned over to the Investigative Team, the seized materials relating to the President must be reviewed by the only person who is truly motivated to ensure that the privilege is properly invoked and applied: the privilege-holder himself, the President.”
So, the president’s legal team noted that they, not the federal government, should be given first crack at the confiscated materials to determine if it was relevant to the case. This, by the way, is something that the FBI allowed Hillary Clinton to do without Hillary even appealing to a judge to get it done. The corrupt Comey and his team just let Hillary take out any email she wanted during the corrupt “investigation” into her email scandal.
But, judge Wood ruled against Trump’s lawyers.
So, just who is this Judge Kimba Wood? Shockingly, it appears that this woman is so entirely compromised by links to the extreme left that she should never have been allowed to rule on this case at all.
Firstly, it has emerged that Wood officiated at George Soros’ wedding in 2013. You’ll know Soros as the billionaire who is the biggest enemy to the United States in the world.
“Federal judge Kimba Wood officiated at the non-denominational wedding, which was attended only by family members, including Soros’ five children from his two previous marriages.”
Yes, the same Kimba Wood overseeing Trump-Cohen case. https://t.co/d3aIJBeBRr
— Mike Cernovich 🇺🇸 (@Cernovich) April 16, 2018
Wood was also widely understood to have been Hillary Clinton’s pick to be Attorney General when Hillary was First Lady to President Bill Clinton. You might recall that Wood got knocked out of the running when it was revealed that she had hired an illegal alien as a nanny.
This is the woman presiding over the court case involving @realDonaldTrump’s lawyer.
Her name is Kimba Wood.
She forced lawyer Michael Cohen to disclose the names of his OTHER clients.
She is a Clinton confidante who was chosen by Hillary to be AG.
— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) April 16, 2018
“Surprisingly, the First Lady interviewed Wood for 90 minutes, twice as much time as the president spent with his prospective chief legal officer, according to White House sources,” The Washington Post reported in 1993. The paper added that Wood was “described by friends as highly intelligent but private person unsuited to big-time politics. Quite apart from her baby-sitter problem, she was unfamiliar with criminal law and lacked any courtroom lawyer experience before being named to the bench in 1988.”
At Monday’s court hearing, the list of Cohen’s clients requested by Wood revealed Fox News host Sean Hannity‘s name among them. The ensuing fallout, in light of Wood’s background, make the apparent breach of confidentiality even more glaring.
Trump declared on Sunday that attorney-client privilege is “now a thing of the past.”
“Attorney Client privilege is now a thing of the past,” the president tweeted. “I have many (too many!) lawyers and they are probably wondering when their offices, and even homes, are going to be raided with everything, including their phones and computers, taken. All lawyers are deflated and concerned!”
Sadly, this biased, unqualified woman is placed in a position of ruling on things she should never have been allowed to hear.
Indeed, a federal judge connected to George Soros should be fired for that alone, much less her connection to the enemies of the person she is supposed to be judging.